Reaction Essay To An Editorial

Student NameTeacher NameClass TitleJanuary 14 , 2007Lieberman for `Peanut Butter SocialismA recent newspaper column in the sore York Times has taken a reflection at the state of American anti-terrorism patronage the editor concludes that the ideals of invigorated York mayor Michael Bloomberg concerning favoritism of funding are further light to those of incoming Senator in charge , Joseph Lieberman While Bloomberg has stated his visible horizon opinion that cities manage New York are at extreme greater risk of terrorism and therefore need more(prenominal) than property than other separate of the country , Lieberman has retained his more socialistic belief (he is not affiliated with any troupe and gained his coiffure as an Independent ) that national funding moldiness be allocated even soly to all vicinitys a nd urban areas of the linked States . The editorial (cited at a lower place ) has sided with mayor Bloomberg , and the editor refers to Lieberman s funding plans as the ` wild hit butter effect evenly spread across the nationWho is even in this situation ? It is a difficult and certainly problematical question , however like most situations under scrawny scrutiny it becomes evident that both workforce are fence in valid points Bloomberg is understandably concerned about the cling toion of his metropolis which is undeniably under more threat than other separate of the country from terrorism the attacks on the World Trade firecracker in New York City were indeed the first terrorist exercise that brought attention to the funding in the first place .

To the city manager , it only makes sense to fortify such areas of the United States as are obvious tar seizes for terrorists and make part use of the federal official funding by doing soConversely , Lieberman feels that it is both the well(p) of every urban center in America to move over access to funding to protect itself and also the responsibility of the federal government to provide the heart to do so ground on his blanket plot of fund allocation , the bills available to major cities like New York is brought d profess drastically this is the major concern of the Mayor and his supporters . While this aspect of Lieberman s bear upon social plan is put one across to him as well as his detractors the Senator s decision has been based on his underlying belief that each and every city or region of the country deserves the money to protect itself from terrorismUndeni ably , both men grant raised important issues of both social substructure flops and risks inbred in particular areas of the country . If these ideals were merged to put downher , maybe it might be possible for cities to all have the right to claim this funding , however for each of them to run their own risk assessment and decide for themselves whether or not it is unavoidable . Certainly , New York would claim its share of the funding ascribable to obvious reasons a small city far interior and without national monuments , federal buildings and international attention may set far fewer risks and therefore claim each no funding or a small measuring sit to fortify one or two particular...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper